home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT0963>
- <title>
- May 06, 1991: Business Notes:Litigation
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- May 06, 1991 Scientology
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BUSINESS, Page 49
- Business Notes
- LITIGATION
- The FDA Gets Fresh
- </hdr><body>
- <p> What is the difference between a glass of orange juice
- straight from the fruit and a glass concocted from water and
- frozen concentrate? According to consumer-product giant Procter &
- Gamble, nothing. For a year, P&G has hyped its Citrus Hill
- orange juice by dubbing it "Fresh Choice" on containers that
- acknowledge in less splashy lettering that Citrus Hill is "from
- concentrate." The Food and Drug Administration, insisting that
- fresh means fresh, has spent the past four months seeking
- changes in the product's label that Cincinnati-based P&G refused
- to make without a guarantee that competitors would be required
- to meet the same standards.
- </p>
- <p> Last week recently appointed FDA commissioner David
- Kessler made it plain that he intended to enforce the label
- laws: U.S. marshals descended on a warehouse outside Minneapolis
- and impounded 24,000 half-gallon cartons of Citrus Hill, an
- unusual action considering the prominence of the brand name and
- its manufacturer. P&G's response: a sudden agreement to remove
- the word fresh from the disputed orange juice containers. Notes
- a satisfied FDA official: "We've got a different commissioner.
- He is saying we're not a paper tiger."
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-